What Event Triggered The Civil Service Reform Of The 1880s?

Civil service reform in the United States was a major result in the late 19th century at the national level, and in the early 20th century at the state level. Proponents denounced the distribution of government offices—the "spoils"—by the winners of elections to their supporters as corrupt and inefficient. They demanded nonpartisan scientific methods and credential be used to select civil servants. The five important civil service reforms were the ii Tenure of Office Acts of 1820 and 1867, Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883, the Hatch Acts (1939 and 1940) and the CSRA of 1978.^[1] In addition, the Civil Service Act of 1888 signed by President Grover Cleveland drastically expanded the ceremonious service organization.^[2]

Early on aggressive demands for civil service reform, particularly stemming from Democratic arguments, were associated with white supremacy and opposition towards economical and social gains fabricated by blacks through the spoils system which pro-civil rights Republican "Stalwarts" shrewdly utilized during the Reconstruction and Aureate Age eras.^[3] Historian Eric Foner writes that at the time of the Reconstruction era, blacks recognized that the establishing of a ceremonious service organization would forestall "the whole colored population" from property public office.^[4]

Amidst contemporary criticisms of the Usa civil service system, some argue that the provisions of the Pendleton Act allowing for arbitrary expansion of civil service protections through the usage of federal executive activeness consequence in a subsequently massive bureaucracy that cannot be held to account.^[5]

Spoils organisation [edit]

In 1801 President Thomas Jefferson, alarmed that Federalists dominated the civil service and the army, identified the party affiliation of office holders and systematically appointed Autonomous-Republicans. Andrew Jackson in 1829 began the systematic rotation of officeholders after four years, replacing them with his partisans in a controversial move. By the 1830s the "spoils system" meant the systematic replacement of officeholders every time the authorities inverse party easily.^[vi]

Reform efforts [edit]

The kickoff code of civil service reforms was designed to replace patronage appointees with nonpartisan employees qualified because of their skills.

Ulysses S. Grant [edit]

President Ulysses S. Grant.

President Ulysses S. Grant (1869–1877) spoke out in favor of civil service reform, and rejected demands in belatedly 1872 by Pennsylvania senator Simon Cameron and governor John Hartranft to suspend the rules and make patronage appointments.^[seven]

Grant's Civil Service Committee reforms had limited success, as his cabinet implemented a merit system that increased the number of qualified candidates and relied less on congressional patronage.^[8] Interior Secretary Columbus Delano, all the same, exempted his department from competitive examinations, and Congress refused to enact permanent Ceremonious Service reform. Zachariah Chandler, who succeeded Delano, fabricated sweeping reforms in the unabridged Interior Department; Grant ordered Chandler to fire all corrupt clerks in the Agency of Indian Diplomacy.^[9] Grant appointed reformers Edwards Pierrepont and Marshall Jewell equally Chaser General and Postmaster General, respectively, who supported Bristow'southward investigations.^[x] In 1875, Pierrepont cleaned up abuse amongst the Usa Attorneys and Marshals in the South.^[eleven]

Grant, who did not share the mindset of liberal reformers, faced opposition by the insurgent Liberal Republican Party in the 1872 United States presidential ballot in spite of his reform efforts inside the federal government. The Liberal Republicans, led by Charles Sumner, B. Gratz Brown, and Carl Schurz, nominated Horace Greeley, who would lose the general election to Grant.^[12]

The Pendleton Human activity [edit]

Senator George H. Pendleton of Ohio.

The Civil Service Reform Act (called "the Pendleton Human activity") is an 1883 federal police force that created the Us Ceremonious Service Commission.^[13] It eventually placed well-nigh federal employees on the merit system and marked the end of the so-called "spoils arrangement".^[13] Drafted during the Chester A. Arthur administration, the Pendleton Act served every bit a response to President James Garfield's assassination past a disappointed function seeker.^[xiii] The Act was passed into constabulary in January 1883; it was sponsored past Democratic senator George H. Pendleton of Ohio. It was drafted by Dorman Bridgman Eaton, a leading reformer who became the start chairman of the U.South. Civil Service Commission. Its nearly famous commissioner was Theodore Roosevelt (1889–95).

The new law prohibited mandatory entrada contributions, or "assessments", which amounted to 50–75% of party financing in the Gold Age. 2d, the Pendleton Act required entrance exams for aspiring bureaucrats.^[thirteen] At first it covered very few jobs but there was a ratchet provision whereby outgoing presidents could lock in their own appointees past converting their jobs to ceremonious service. Political reformers, typified by the Mugwumps demanded an finish to the spoils system. Later on a serial of party reversals at the presidential level (in 1884, 1888, 1892, 1896), the consequence was that near federal jobs were under ceremonious service. Ane result was more expertise and less politics. An unintended consequence was the shift of the parties to reliance on funding from business, since they could no longer depend on patronage hopefuls.^[13] Mark Hanna constitute a substitute revenue stream in 1896, by assessing corporations.^[14]

Mugwumps [edit]

The Mugwumps were Republicans who refused to support Republican presidential candidate James G. Blaine in 1884.

Political patronage, besides known as the "spoils organization", was the issue that angered many reform-minded Republicans, leading them to reject Blaine'south candidacy. In the spoils organization, the winning candidate would dole out government positions to those who had supported his political party prior to the election. Although the Pendleton Act of 1883 fabricated competency and merit the base qualifications for government positions, its effective implementation was slow. Political affiliation continued to be the basis for engagement to many positions.^[15]

In the early 1880s, the issue of political patronage split the Republican Party down the middle for several consecutive sessions of Congress. The party was divided into two warring factions, each with creative names. The side that held the upper hand in numbers and popular support were the Half-Breeds, led by senator James Chiliad. Blaine of Maine since 1880. The Half-Breeds supported civil service reform, and often blocked legislation and political appointments put forth by their main congressional opponents, the Stalwarts, led past Roscoe Conkling of New York.

Ironically, in spite of Blaine'due south condition every bit a convert into the pro-ceremonious service reform "Half-Breeds," the Mugwumps rejected his candidacy primarily due to his corruption. Their ranks were informally joined by Vermont Republican George F. Edmunds, a staunch Half-Brood who never accustomed Blaine as an honest convert and opposed the Maine senator's candidacy. During the campaign, Edmunds stated:^[16]

Information technology is my deliberate opinion that Senator Blaine acts as the attorney of Jay Gould. Whenever [Allen M. Thurman] and I have settled upon legislation to bring the Pacific Railroad to terms of equity with the government, upwards has jumped Mr. James M. Blaine musket in hand, from behind the breastworks of Jay Gould's lobby to fire in our faces.

This division among Republicans may have contributed to the victory in 1884 of Grover Cleveland, the start president elected from the Democratic party since the Civil War. In the period from 1876 to 1892, presidential elections were closely contested at the national level, but the states themselves were generally dominated past a single political party, with Democrats prevailing in the Southward and the Republicans in the Northeast. Although the defection of the Mugwumps may accept helped Cleveland win in New York, one of the few closely contested states, historians attribute Cleveland's victory nationwide to the ascension power of urban immigrant voters.^[17]

Progressive era [edit]

The 1883 constabulary simply applied to federal jobs: not to the state and local jobs that were the chief basis for political machines. Ethical degeneration was halted by reform in civil service and municipal reform in the Progressive Era, which led to structural changes in authoritative departments and changes in the manner the government managed public diplomacy.^[18]

Recent civil service reform efforts [edit]

George W. Bush assistants efforts [edit]

The 2001 September xi attacks gave George W. Bush the political support needed in order to launch ceremonious service reforms in US agencies related to national security. At get-go these efforts primarily targeted the then-new Department of Homeland Security (DHS), but the Section of Defense (DOD) as well received large reform efforts. According to Kellough, Nigro, and Brewer, such attempts included "restrictions on collective bargaining, such as the authorisation given to departmental secretaries (and, in the case of the DOD, other loftier-level officials equally well) unilaterally to [repeal] negotiated agreements and the limitations imposed on employee rights in agin deportment." However, ultimately the efforts at civil service reform were undone. The DHS announced on 1 October, 2008 that it was abandoning the new civil service system and returning to the previous one.^[19]

Barack Obama administration efforts [edit]

Throughout President Barack Obama's Administration, the U.s. Role of Personnel Management (OPM)'s "overarching focus has been to modernize the way OPM supports agencies, current and former federal employees, and their families then that the Federal Workforce better serves the American people."^[20]

Donald Trump administration efforts [edit]

President Donald Trump took action on reforming the civil service by signing "a trio of executive orders that reform ceremonious service rules past expediting termination for cause, revamping union contracts and limiting taxpayer-funded union work at agencies"^[21] in May 2018. In October 2020, Trump signed another executive guild transferring at least 100,000 government jobs from beingness classified as "competitive service" to "excepted service," a motion deemed an undermining of the Pendleton Human activity.^[22]

Joe Biden administration efforts [edit]

In January 2021, President Joe Biden signed an executive lodge reversing the actions of his predecessor Trump that sought to undermine the ceremonious service system.^[23]

Notes [edit]

^ Scott C. James, "Patronage Regimes and American Party Development from 'The Age of Jackson' to the Progressive Era", British Periodical of Political Science 36#one (2006): 39–60. online]
^ December 5, 1888. President Grover Cleveland Expands the Coverage of the Civil Service Act, In a Alphabetic character to His Postmaster General. RAAB Collection. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
^ Matthews, Dylan (July 20, 2016). Donald Trump and Chris Christie are reportedly planning to purge the civil service. Vox. Retrieved Jan 27, 2022.
^ Foner, Eric (1988). Reconstruction: America'due south Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877, p. 507. New York: Harper & Row.
^ Stepman, Inez Feltscher (February ii, 2017). To 'drain the swamp,' Trump should await to states' ceremonious service reform. The Hill. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
^ Erik McKinley Eriksson, "The Federal Civil Service Under President Jackson", Mississippi Valley Historical Review thirteen.iv (1927): 517–40.
^ Kennedy, Robert C. (2001). "No Surrender". Harpweek.
^ Jean Edward Smith, Grant (2001) pp. 589–90.
^ John Y. Simon, "Ulysses S. Grant". in Henry Graff, ed., The Presidents: A Reference History (7th ed. 2002). pp. 245–60 p. 250.
^ Smith, Grant (2001) pp. 584–85.
^ William B. Hesseltine, Ulysses Due south. Grant: Political leader (1935) p. 374
^ Liberal Republican Party. Encyclopedia.com. Retrieved March iii, 2022.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^{due east} Roark, James 50.; Johnson, Michael P.; Furstenburg, Francois; Cline Cohen, Patricia; Hartmann, Susan M.; Phase, Sarah; Igo, Sarah E. (2020). "Affiliate 18 The Gilded Age: 1865–1900". The American Hope: A History of the U.s.a. (Kindle). Vol. Combined Volume (Value Edition, 8th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's. Kindle Locations 13795–13835. ISBN978-1319208929. OCLC 1096495503.
^ Ari Hoogenboom, "The Pendleton Act and the Civil Service", American Historical Review 64.2 (1959): 301–eighteen.
^ Hoogenboom (1961)
^ Ward, Benjamin. The Downfall of Senator George F. Edmunds: The Election of 1884. Vermont History. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
^ Mark Wahlgren Summers, Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion: The Making of a President, 1884 (2000)
^ Pamela Due south. Tolbert and Lynne One thousand. Zucker. "Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935", Administrative Science Quarterly (1983): 22–39.
^ Kellough, J. Edward; Nigro, Lloyd G.; Brewer, Gene A. (2010). "Civil Service Reform Nether George W. Bush-league: Ideology, Politics, and Public Personnel Administration". Review of Public Personnel Administration. SAGE Publications. 30 (4): 404–422. doi:10.1177/0734371X10381488. ISSN 0734-371X. OCLC 60688742. S2CID 153368460.
^ "U.S. Office of Personnel Direction Cabinet Exit Memo | CHCOC". chcoc.gov . Retrieved 2018-11-14 .
^ http://www.washingtontimes.com, The Washington Times. "Trump revamps civil service rules, makes it easier to fire bad federal employees". The Washington Times . Retrieved 2018-eleven-13 .
^ Garrett, Laurie (October 25, 2020). How Trump could undermine Fauci and remake the United states of america regime. CNN. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
^ January 22, 2021. Executive Order on Protecting the Federal Workforce. The White House. Retrieved March 3, 2022.

References [edit]

This article incorporates cloth from the Citizendium article "Civil service reform in the United states", which is licensed under the Artistic Commons Attribution-ShareAlike iii.0 Unported License just non under the GFDL.

Bibliography [edit]

Fesler, James Due west. and Donald F. Kettl. The Politics of the Administrative Process, (2nd ed. 1996), textbook.
Hoogenboom, Ari. Outlawing the Spoils: A History of the Ceremonious Service Reform Movement, 1865–1883 (1961)
Hoogenboom, Ari. "The Pendleton Act and the Civil Service Reform." American Historical Review 1959. 64: 301–18. in JSTOR.
Hoogenboom, Ari. "Thomas A. Jenckes and Civil Service Reform." Mississippi Valley Historical Review 1961. 47: 636–58. in JSTOR
Huddleston, Marker West., and William Due west. Boyer. The College Civil Service in the United States: Quest for Reform (1996),
Ingraham, Patricia Wallace. The Foundation of Merit: Public Service in American Democracy. 1995.
Ingraham, Patricia Due west., and David H. Rosenbloom, eds. The Promise and Paradox of Ceremonious Service Reform, (1992
Johnson, Ronald N., and Gary D. Libecap. The Federal Ceremonious Service Arrangement and the Problem of Bureaucracy: The Economics and Politics of Institutional Alter 1994
Moynihan, Donald P. "Protection Versus Flexibility: the Civil Service Reform Human activity, Competing Administrative Doctrines, and the Roots of Contemporary Public Management Argue." Journal of Policy History 2004 16(1): one–33. ISSN 0898-0306 Fulltext: [ one. Project Muse and Ebsco
Park, Soo-Immature. "Who Is Our Master? Congressional Debates during Civil Service Reforms." PhD dissertation Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and Land U. 2005. 218 pp. DAI 2006 67(ii): 715-A. DA3208258
Roark, James L.; Johnson, Michael P.; Furstenburg, Francois; Cline Cohen, Patricia; Hartmann, Susan M.; Stage, Sarah; Igo, Sarah E. The American Promise: a History of the United States, Value Edition, Combined Volume. 8th edition. (Kindle Locations 13795-13835). Bedford/St. Martin's. Kindle Edition. Textbook.
Shafritz, Jay One thousand. et al. Personnel Management in Government: Politics and Process (2001), textbook
Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacity, 1877–1920 (1982).
Summers, Marking Due west. The Plundering Generation: Corruption and the Crisis of the Union, 1849–1861 (1987).
Van Riper, Paul P. History of the United States Ceremonious Service (1958).
Weber J., "Leonard Dupee White and Public Administration", Journal of Direction History, Book 2, Number ii, Feb 1996, pp. 41–64
White, Leonard D. The Federalists: a Report in Administrative History, 1956.
White, Leonard D. The Jeffersonians: a Written report in Administrative History (1952)
White, Leonard D. The Jacksonians: a Study in Administrative History online at ACLS e-books (1954)
White, Leonard D. The Republican Era, 1869–1901 a Study in Administrative History, 1958 online at ACLS eastward-books
White, Richard D., Jr. Roosevelt the Reformer: Theodore Roosevelt as Ceremonious Service Commissioner, 1889–1895. (2003). 264 pp.